M.3 REHABILITATION OF HISTORIC PROPERTIESDesign and renovation guidelines for historic districts, such as those within Fort Carson are of necessity much broader than design guidelines for single structures. Such guidelines must not only address the appropriate architectural image (style, material, etc.) for proposed new buildings, they must also address how a proposed action within the historic district will impact the integrity of the original design intent of the given historic area. Alternate procedures (AAP) provide a new method for managing historic properties. The AAP, a streamlined approach to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, now allows installations to manage historic properties programmatically rather than through a project-by-project consultation process. These procedures also enable installations to leverage existing Army and DoD program requirements while internally managing historic properties in a more efficient and cost effective manner. M.3.1 NEW WORKNew work shall not conflict with the existing architectural character. For example, it should not:
New work shall seek to enhance and protect the historic quality and existing resources. For example:
New work shall provide necessary modern conveniences as unobtrusively as possible. For example, it should:
New work shall gradually eliminate existing intrusions. For example, it should:
M.3.2 TREATMENT OF HISTORIC FABRICThe most effective way to preserve historic properties is to keep them in use and to consistently maintain them. When buildings and grounds are consistently used for their intended purposes and regular maintenance is conducted, there is rarely a need for extensive preservation work. Only when they are misused, underused, or left vacant for long periods of time does large-scale rehabilitation become necessary. It follows that if a regular maintenance program is put into effect once a property has been appropriately renovated, another major rehabilitation will rarely be required. M.3.3 STANDARDS FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROJECTSM.3.3.1 Compatible Use of Historic Sites and StructuresEvery reasonable effort should be made to use a historic structure or site for its originally intended purpose or to provide a compatible use. The use should be compatible in the sense that it involves minimal alteration to the property and/or has no adverse effect upon its historic integrity. Use of the site and structure should be regulated to prevent alterations that are potentially damaging to historic fabric and/or cultural context. M.3.3.2 Retention of Character Defining FeaturesDistinguishing stylistic or character defining features and examples of skilled craftsmanship should not be destroyed, altered, or removed from a historic site or structure. All such fabric should be treated with sensitivity and preserved in its original context and form. M.3.3.3 Treatment of Deteriorated Historic FabricDeteriorated historic fabric should be repaired rather than replaced whenever possible. When replacement is unavoidable, new material, whether man-made or natural, should match the existing fabric in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual/structural qualities. M.3.3.4 Documentation of Missing Historic ElementsReplacement of missing historic elements should be based on the accurate duplication of features known to have existed and substantiated by historic pictorial and/or physical evidence and not on conjecture, nor simply on the example of similar treatment found on other structures or sites of the same period or region. M.3.3.5 Retention of Historic AlterationsChanges to a historic structure or site, which have occurred over the course of time, may provide evidence of important social or cultural processes. As such, they should be respected and their potential significance carefully evaluated. M.3.3.6 Unacceptable AlterationsHistoric sites and structures should be recognized as products of their own time and as part of an important cultural process. Alterations that have no historical basis, or that destroy the authenticity of the place, are discouraged. M.3.3.7 Acceptable Alterations and AdditionsWhen possible, alterations and new additions to historic structures or sites should be done in such a manner as to leave the essential form and integrity unimpaired. M.3.3.8 Contemporary Design in a Historic ContextContemporary design for additions to existing historic sites or districts should not be discouraged if such design is compatible with the massing, proportions, scale, materials, color, views, and general contextual relationships of the place. M.3.3.9 Surface Cleaning MethodsSurface cleaning of structures or buildings should be undertaken with the gentlest possible means, and only when cleaning is essential to the preservation of the buildings. Cleaning methods, such as sand blasting, which could damage historic material or speed their deterioration, are discouraged. M.3.3.10 Archaeological ResourcesAll treatment work, which potentially affects surface or sub-surface pre-historic or historic archaeological resources, should be coordinated with an archaeologist. M.3.3.11 Historic Preservation and MaintenanceThe guidelines contained within this IDG are general in nature. The IDG must be utilized in conjunction with the Installation ICRMP. M.3.4 GUIDELINES FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROJECTSM.3.4.1 Roof Guidelines
M.3.4.2 Wall Guidelines
M.3.4.3 Porch Guidelines
M.3.4.4 Window Guidelines
M.3.4.5 Door Guidelines
M.3.4.6 Color Guidelines
M.3.4.7 Painting Guidelines
M.3.4.8 Handicap and Safety Access GuidelinesAs a general rule, buildings listed in or determined eligible for listing in the National Register may receive special consideration for meeting safety and accessibility requirements. Any modifications required to bring a historic structure in compliance with safety and accessibility codes should be carefully planned and undertaken so that they do not adversely affect the design of main entrances or principal façades.
M.3.4.9 Mechanical Equipment GuidelinesIn many cases within historic districts, mechanical equipment is located outside the building. When historic structures are renovated and mechanical systems are upgraded, equipment placement should be planned in order to make the least visual impact.
M.3.4.10 Guidelines for AdditionsIn general, additions should follow all of the guidelines for new construction within historic districts; but, because their proximity makes the potential for damage to historic fabric even greater, there are additional principles that should be followed.
M.3.4.11 Force ProtectionThese guidelines should be used in conjunction with the UFC 4-010-01, DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings and the Force Protection Design Standards of this Installation Design Guide.
|
||
APPENDIX M – HISTORIC PRESERVATION |